New Supreme Court Simulations Engage Students Through Media-Rich, Whole-Class Experiences

New Supreme Court Simulations Engage Students Through Media-Rich, Whole-Class Experiences

iCivics launched Supreme Decision, a new simulation tool that equips teachers to guide their classrooms through a collaborative experience in which students explore different perspectives and work together to navigate landmark U.S. Supreme Court cases in U.S. history.

Supreme Decision simulations—iCivics’ first multiplayer offering—help educators turn their classroom into the Supreme Court as students are assigned the role of Petitioner, Respondent, or Supreme Court Justice. Students are guided through a web-based in-person experience where they learn about judicial lenses, are introduced to facts of the case, prepare for and present arguments, deliberate and rule, and finally discuss the results and reflect on the experience. The simulation is designed to bring the workings of the Supreme Court to life while giving students a first-person, active role in debating and deciding cases about topics that are relevant to their own lives: Student free speech and due process. 

The two cases are based on real-life cases that were central to the legacy of iCivics’ Founder, Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, Tinker v. Des Moines and Goss v. Lopez.

Each module includes videos that provide context and primary sources to help students understand their assigned roles as they work through these two cases. 

  • In Supreme Decision: Student Free Speech, students debate the fictional case of Ben Brewer, a high school student who was suspended for violating the school dress code. Students examine the First Amendment right to free speech and apply the precedent of Tinker v. Des Moines to answer the question: Does the U.S. Constitution protect Ben’s right to wear a band T-shirt to school?
  • In Supreme Decision: Due Processstudents examine thefictionalcase of Jamie Johnson, a high school student who was suspended after a student protest. By applying the precedent of Goss v. Lopez and the right to due process, students will answer the question: Does the U.S. Constitution protect Jamie’s right to due process before a suspension from school?

These simulations use technology to facilitate, not replace, student interaction and engagement and create a controlled environment to have debates in a manner that allows a full range of opinions to be heard safely.

Explore more from the educator blog

We Can Teach Hard Things, Like Executive Powers

The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. —The Constitution of the United States. Art. II Sect. 1 cl. 1 Teaching executive power can be daunting in any political climate. Its scope is contested, oftentimes along political lines, and the Constitution offers minimal

Paul’s students declare the Declaration for Civic Star Challenge

My approach to teaching has always been to prepare my students to be active, contributing members of their civil society. As I stated in my interview for my teaching position at Air Force Academy High School (AFAHS) years ago, the students of today are the Social Security payers of tomorrow—so

We Can Teach Hard Things, like Foreign Policy

Note: This blog post covers the concept of foreign policy, both from a traditional perspective and a current event standpoint, in response to U.S. military operations in Venezuela. On the morning of January 4, 2026 — about 36 hours after U.S. forces launched airstrikes and ground operations in Venezuela, resulting