High Schoolers use Private i Lesson to Teach Kindergarteners

For elementary teachers, time is precious. How and what they teach is constantly balanced between the important and the urgent. Oftentimes, social studies is pushed aside—taught only if there’s time left in the day. But there’s a lot elementary teachers can do to teach civics and promote good civic practices. It doesn’t have to be limited to lessons about presidents, checks and balances, or the Constitution. Being an engaged citizen often starts with a question—and through iCivics’ Private i History Detectives curriculum, students in grades K–5 get a solid foundation on what it means to be a good citizen.

In an effort to embrace and engage younger students in the democratic process, my AP Government & Politics students built civic engagement lessons using iCivics’ Private i units. Last June, three students—Lyla, Rachel, and Desi—visited a kindergarten class at the Slaybaugh School in Egg Harbor Township. The goal was simple, yet challenging: the high school students needed to build a lesson that had a civic component without being obviously partisan or too difficult for the kindergarteners to grasp.

The AP Government students found the lesson cleverly designed. Framed as a detective story, it asks students to investigate what makes a good leader. My high schoolers first went through the lesson themselves and then adapted it into an interactive, age-appropriate activity for their younger buddies. Rachel, one of the seniors, said, “I liked how the resources can be used for all ages. My friends and I could play in class, or I could use it to teach the little kids.”

The senior team simplified the content, created visuals, acted out leadership scenarios, and led discussions with the kindergarteners about what it means to be kind, fair, and responsible.

Watching my students take ownership of the material and find ways to connect it to five-year-olds was a powerful teaching moment. It gave them a chance to reflect on leadership traits in a deeper, more personal way and reinforced the idea that civic values can—and should—be taught at every age.

The kindergarteners were fully engaged—asking questions, pointing out good (and not-so-good) leader behavior, and even coming up with their own “classroom leader” rules. The partnership between older and younger students added a level of connection and mentorship that went far beyond a traditional classroom lesson.

Lyla told me that what she liked most about the experience was the early exposure to civics—without it being explicitly labeled as “civics.” She said, “I liked how the Private i resource made it easy for the kindergarteners to begin building knowledge and establish good habits about civics and leadership at a young age.”

iCivics has always done a great job of making civics accessible and engaging, but this experience using Private i: What Makes Someone a Good Leader? in a cross-age teaching format was exceptional. In just one hour, the kindergarten students learned a lot about leadership, developed civic learning skills, and came together as one classroom community.

If you’re an elementary teacher new to using iCivics, I highly recommend the Private i lessons to foster leadership, empathy, and a sense of civic responsibility across age groups.

Written by Michael Martirone

Michael Martirone teaches AP Government & Politics and World Cultures at Egg Harbor Township High School in New Jersey. He is also an adjunct professor at Richard Stockton University. In 2016, Michael was a finalist for the New Jersey State Teacher of the Year, and in 2020, he was named the Gilder Lehrman History Teacher of the Year for the state of New Jersey. He has been a member of the iCivics Educator Network since 2017.

Through the iCivics Educator Network, the perspectives of teachers across the country contribute to the public conversation about civic education in the United States. Each contributor represents their own opinion. We welcome this plurality of perspectives.

We Can Teach Hard Things Like Due Process

You’re a social studies teacher, and it’s time to teach due process. Unless you’ve been living in a cave or severely limiting your media diet (which is hardly an unreasonable habit), then alarm bells may be starting to go off in your head. Don’t worry! We’ve got you covered.

As always, the first thing you want to do is consult your state standards. Let’s use an example.

To pick a state, I decided to throw a dart at the map on my office wall. Unfortunately, it’s a world map from 1986, and I’m bad at darts, so it landed on Czechoslovakia. Let’s go with California, since that also starts with a C. Sorry, Colorado. You, too, Connecticut.

Exhibit A. Evidence of Emma’s super below-average dart-throwing abilities, which has been leveraged in defense of my husband’s new rule that “Emma is not allowed to throw darts in the house”. I checked, and the rule does not apply to the kids or the dog, so I’m filing an appeal on strict scrutiny grounds.

Here’s what Standard 8.2.6 for Grade Eight United States History and Geography: Growth and Conflict in the History-Social Science Content Standards for California Public Schools says: Students analyze the political principles underlying the U.S. Constitution and compare the enumerated and implied powers of the federal government.

  1. Enumerate the powers of government set forth in the Constitution and the fundamental liberties ensured by the Bill of Rights

Here’s what Standard 12.5.1 for Grade Twelve Principles of American Democracy and Economics says: Students summarize landmark U.S. Supreme Court interpretations of the Constitution and its amendments.

  1. Understand the changing interpretations of the Bill of Rights over time, including interpretations of the basic freedoms (religion, speech, press, petition, and assembly) articulated in the First Amendment and the due process and equal-protection-of-the-law clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment

We’ve got the standards! We’re making progress. Now, it’s time to craft the perfect lesson plan.

But first, remember when I said that you’re allowed to turn off “Breaking News” notifications on your devices? I meant it, but I can’t help but share with you these wild “due process-related” headlines:

  • Man claiming to be a U.S. citizen held for deportation (Ng Fung Ho v. White)
  • President signs order forcing all people from a certain country to report to detention camps (Korematsu v. United States)
  • Florida man denied counsel in misdemeanor case; sentenced to 5 years state prison (Gideon v. Wainwright)

You’re probably on to me. You know these are historical headlines, not current ones. Here’s the thing: you and I both know the overwhelming majority of our students couldn’t tell us if these things happened yesterday or over 100 years ago, as is the case with the first bullet point. That presents an opportunity to “Use historical examples instead of current ones.”

Based on the direction I’m taking here, this presents an opportunity to “Use primary sources, secondary readings, and/or digital media as ‘grounding texts.’” Here are some I recommend, although please don’t think you need to use all of them!

Primary Sources

  • The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution; Article 1. Section 9 of the Constitution
  • Supreme Court decisions in Ng Fung Ho v. White, Korematsu v. United States, and Gideon v. Wainwright

Secondary Sources

Educational Media

As students learn about and evaluate historical examples, it’s only natural that they make comparisons to the present day and current events. That’s perfectly fine, and brings us to another piece of We Can Teach Hard Things guidance: Build compare and contrast skills by asking students to distinguish current events as typical or not typical.

How is what they’re seeing today similar to or different from the way things have unfolded historically? That said, be sure to help students identify unfair or false comparisons. A controversy today may evolve very differently from the way it would have appeared to evolve in the past, but are we truly comparing two identical episodes? What makes them similar? In what ways are they different?

Also, be cautious of complex Supreme Court decisions that involve multiple holdings or holdings that may have been reversed or weakened by subsequent decisions.

And lastly, if a student raises their hand and says something to the effect of, “Aren’t we deporting people now without hearings or trials?” or “I heard the government is putting everyone who looks Hispanic in detention camps. Is that true?” I encourage you to refer back to the guidance we provided in our previous blog post on teaching about the separation of powers. The great part about that guidance is that it’s content agnostic! No matter what the student’s question is, assuming it’s not grossly inappropriate, it is always appropriate to acknowledge and address it at a later time.

Admin Tip: Take a look at your state standards related to due process. This will give you confidence in your ability to field any inquiries or challenges from off-campus stakeholders. As always, tell your social studies teachers you are there to support them!

Jessica transports students to American Revolution through Civic Star Challenge

Our school is nestled in the Ozark Mountains of Arkansas, and it’s a real hub of the community — it seems like nearly everyone’s mom, dad, or grandparent works as a teacher, bus driver, or secretary. We graduate about 120 students a year, and I’ve known most of them since birth. Though we’re rural, we’re far from isolated. Travel is a passion of mine, and I’ve shared it with students through fellowships and trips: from meeting Gen. Colin Powell in D.C. to studying in France. And soon my students will be part of Senator John Boozman’s youth cabinet in Little Rock.

Still, some of the most transporting experiences happen right in my classroom. That’s what the Civic Star Challenge is all about. When we learn about the American Revolution, I try to turn my class into a time machine.

That starts by challenging the students to walk in the shoes of colonists. We learn about what they wore, how they created their clothes, and even how they brushed their teeth. We also learn colonial era dances! Then we create life-sized portraits of Federalists and Anti-Federalists. The students trace their bodies on giant pieces of paper, then complete the portrait. Students are able to see – and feel – history come to life. Rather than it just being something listed in a book, they can imagine what it’s like to be these people.

From there, we talk more about what it would be like to experience the tumult of the Revolution first-hand. In one class, we took all the events of the American Revolution and they had to write a text to their friend explaining what was going on:

Guess I won’t be sending letters anytime soon. #quittaxingus (Stamp Act, 1765)

The water in the Boston Harbor smells like chamomile! #ThrowTheCratesOverboard #TeaParty (Boston Tea Party, 1773)

The Treaty of Paris has been signed! #NewCountryWhoDis (Treaty of Paris, 1783)

Students are often tempted to parrot back the definitions and explanations they find in their textbooks. While that type of learning is important, I find it’s crucial to find ways for the students to make civics their own. I often say, “You have to say it in your own words or it doesn’t count.” Last week, we spent a whole class decoding the Preamble to the Constitution. Actually, they did the decoding. I stood in the back of the room while the students parsed those 52 words and came up with their own version:

We, in the USA, want a better country.

We will have fair laws.

We will have a peaceful country.

We will have a military to take care of our people.

We will care for our people.

We want to bless the future people.

Now we will put the rules down for this country.

We also find ways to engage the system directly. Each year, the students research Arkansas’s D.C.-based elected officials. They’ll write them letters. And, soon after, the officials will write them back. It’s always so exciting to watch the students hold the Capitol Building stationery up to the light to see the watermark. From there, we’ll set up a call on Zoom – again, I’ll stay at the back of the classroom and let the students run the show. And that’s where I really see the impact of civics learning: students understand how to both model and participate in respectful civic engagement. Even when they disagree with their elected officials, they speak thoughtfully and respectfully, grounded in the work we’ve done together.

After the call, there’s always a buzz in the classroom. The students say, “Wow, I can’t believe this person knows me!” It’s representative democracy in action, and proof that their voice matters.

About Jessica

  • Teaching experience: 23 years in Arkansas public schools
  • Currently teaching: High school Civics/Economics and concurrent college credit history courses

The Gilder Lehrman 2024 History Teacher of the Year for Arkansas, Jessica is the president-elect of the Arkansas Council for the Social Studies and has worked with a number of educational organizations from across the country. She is passionate about educational travel, community engagement, civic involvement, and rural education; she looks forward to completing her doctorate at the University of Arkansas in the spring of 2026.

Bill of Rights Institute and iCivics Announce First Round of Winners in Civic Star Challenge, a Nationwide A250 Initiative

Sixty-three educators have been awarded $300 each for integrating themes from the Declaration of Independence into their teaching in the lead-up to the 250th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence.

WASHINGTON, DC [November 10, 2025] The Bill of Rights Institute and iCivics have named the first round of winners of the Civic Star Challenge, a nationwide initiative to inspire millions of acts of civic learning in the lead-up to the 250th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence.

The Civic Star Challenge makes the teaching of the Declaration of Independence digestible and relatable to today’s youth by providing educators with a repository of adaptable lesson plans and activities that teach the key themes of the founding document. The resources are available at civicstarchallenge.org. Once educators have taught at least one of 11 themes, they can submit a log of their activities for a chance to win from a cash prize pool totaling more than $200,000.

The Challenge includes four rounds of random drawings, each awarding $300 to selected teachers, and an essay contest that has a $10,000 grand prize for the winning teacher’s school district.

The Civic Star Challenge is made possible through generous support from Griffin Catalyst, civic engagement initiative of Citadel Founder and CEO Ken Griffin; the Stand Together Trust; and The Pedersen Foundation.

Today, the 63 winners of the first round of drawings have been announced. The teachers represent more than 25 states.

“The Civic Star Challenge honors the educators who keep America’s founding principles alive in their classrooms,” said David Bobb, President and CEO of the Bill of Rights Institute. “Their work reminds us that civic knowledge and virtue are essential to sustaining liberty for the next generation and to helping students see their role in preserving a free society.”

“The celebration of the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence is an incredible moment to engage in the teaching of our founding documents and in civic education in general – and this has never been more critical,” iCivics CEO Louise Dubé said. “We’re proud to be able to reward teachers for their efforts to connect the themes and ideals from the Declaration to the present.”

The winners are listed below:

Meredith Baker

Andrea Bauck

Jason Bennett

Nicole Bloodgood

Laura Bowersox

Patricia Capobianco

Stacey Clark

Allison Collie

Rachel Cox

Jessica Culver

Scott Cvelbar

Deborah Damboise

Marin Fairbanks

Taneeta Fair

Lauren Feld

Kristina Fischer

Jami Forrester

Randall Furash-Stewart

Jayme Gafford

Nicole Gasparik

Heaven Gomez

Andrew Gordon

Donna Gustafson

Evelyn Homan

Jeanette Hooks

Andrew Hutchinson

Andrea Jandt

Lindsay Kahoe

Samantha Keaton

Bridget Kaiser-Munday

Kennady Longhurst

Jeffrey Maendel

Laura McFarren

Amanda Meyer

Austin Migoski

Lindsay Miller

Katrina Neubrandt

Rachel Newman

Jackie Osborne

Beth Oswald

Michelle Palmer

Patrick Pavelchik

Victoria Pierce

Samantha Rumbaugh

Amanda Runkel

Anne Schmitt

Tiffany Smith

Tracy Son

Donna Stark

Adeline Steger

Adam Sturm

John Suter

Rachel Tate

Hailey Thomas

Deborah Torrens

Sam Westerdale

Holly Wittwer

Daryl Workman

Bryon Wren

Kymberli Wregglesworth

Nicole Wright

Blanche Wulfekoetter

Greg Yarnall

Teaching with The Constitution EXPLAINED

iCivics resources have proved invaluable to every one of my social studies classes, from Civics to African American Studies, to my dual enrollment courses in American Government. Supporting students in their learning about the Constitution is no easy task, as there is so much to cover in a semester course regarding all things civics (as I’m sure many other educators can empathize with—especially those who teach AP Government in a semester, you’re rockstars!). One resource that I would highly recommend to support students in their learning is the Constitution EXPLAINED video series. The videos provide a solid foundation in teaching the big ideas of complex constitutional thinking.

The Constitution EXPLAINED videos that teach the three branches of government are required content resources in my classes because they effectively summarize and condense the big ideas in just a small handful of minutes. For example, when teaching the Legislative Branch, there are numerous videos to select from to support students, one of my favorites being The Do’s and Don’ts of Congress. This is because it provides a solid understanding of the powers and limitations of Congress, while also giving students an opportunity to critically think for themselves about how they think Congress should act by asking, “Do you think the Elastic Clause has been stretched so far that it gives Congress too much power?” Without even having to ask, my first hour automatically launched into their own small group discussions, and it was wonderful to watch.

Whether they were making connections to what they’ve learned so far in class, in other classes, or with current events, the students all seemed very ecstatic to share what they believe. It’s also a conversation I know I can easily revisit, as they really enjoyed their time processing ideas or concepts they would like to see in their lives regarding the ‘dos and don’ts’ of Congress, which is impressive for their age. I love seeing this type of learning come from a resource that is less than 3 minutes long because it turned into a 10-minute conversation, and I’m sure it could have gone on for the rest of the period as well. Each class responded a little bit differently, had different suggestions on what implied powers Congress should or shouldn’t have in a modern society, and had questions on how to create changes within Congress’s power, as well as the other branches of government.

From the educator point of view, the supports that come with each video are also fantastic. The transcripts for each video allow me to provide supports for students with different learning abilities and students who are multilingual learners. The Teacher’s Guide explains how to create a lesson from the video, including vocabulary supports, guiding questions, and learning supports, which are also written in Spanish. There’s even a Claim, Evidence, Reasoning prompt that I plan to use when I teach with these resources next semester, where “students work in pairs to find examples of when the Elastic Clause was used in history. Students should find evidence to support the claim that the use of the Elastic Clause increased Congress´s power. Students can then prepare a one-minute speech explaining their reasoning. They can record their speeches (video or audio) and use visuals for support.” This is a great example of how iCivics provides scaffolds for both new and seasoned educators alike, and offers educators a way to think about teaching differently in the future while also increasing the rigor of their students’ constitutional thinking within our current reality.

Written by Sam Westerdale

Sam Westerdale is in her 14th year of teaching high school social studies in Aurora, Colorado, with classes in Civics and African American Studies. With the support of a James Madison Fellowship awarded in 2018, she earned a master’s in Political Science and also teaches dual enrollment classes in American Government, State & Local Government, and Introduction to Political Science. Sam is a member of the iCivics Ednet Teacher Network, the National Constitution Center’s Advisory Council, and is a Retro Report Teacher Ambassador. She is also a Board Director for the Colorado Council of the Social Studies, a member of the Civics for Colorado Coalition, and supports and trains student teachers through a local university. Sam has a strong passion for creating connections for her students on how to be involved in their community through a rigorous and culturally responsive civics background, along with what it means to support and care for others in an ever-changing world.

Through the iCivics Educator Network, the perspectives of teachers across the country contribute to the public conversation about civic education in the United States. Each contributor represents their own opinion. We welcome this plurality of perspectives.

Luke Selover

When Luke Selover, a humanities teacher at Capitol Hill Day School in Washington, D.C., discovered the Students Engage lesson plan from iCivics, he saw more than a classroom activity—he saw a model for empowerment.

“There is this lesson that I found in my second or third year of teaching, and I just thought the bones of it was so cool,” Selover said. “We essentially created an entire project based on Students Engage, where students propose changes to our school.”

Each year, Selover’s students identify issues they want to improve and present research-based proposals to school leaders. They create action steps and develop an explanation for why these improvements are needed.

“Some of them get approved; some of them don’t,” Selover said. “We’ve been able to enact some really cool changes, and it’s been great practice for them to advocate for things that they want to see and change in the school.”

One early project expanded the school community. In 2021, the school only had a couple of student groups that met regularly. Students recognized the need for more student unions and clubs that reflected the plurality of viewpoints at the school. They proposed adding more affinity groups after seeing the impact of the Black Student Union, and the school’s community has grown to include clubs for young men, neurodivergent students, Latino students, and many more.

“All of that came from this push from the students—‘Hey, we want a space to meet in these different groups,’” he said. “We were able to create all these different affinity groups and give people space to be in affinity with others.”

Another project tackled something close to every student’s heart: lunchtime. Students argued that outdoor lunch would simplify cleanup, extend recess, and improve focus later in the day. The idea stuck, and students are now able to eat outside when the weather is good.

Most recently, students turned their attention to improving their shared learning environment. They spoke to their peers and discovered that noise from transitions and limited access to water were persistent sources of frustration. After doing research and considering roadblocks, like budget and classroom needs, students proposed practical solutions: a noise-blocking curtain and a water bottle filler to replace the water fountain. They even researched pricing and created diagrams illustrating how the space could be altered. 

“I was really proud of this group,” Selover said. “I think the water filler is happening, and they’re still considering some different things we can do to be able to create an easier transition for the folks who are moving throughout the building.”

Selover views the Students Engage project as a training ground for active citizenship, as reflected in the students’ answers to questions on the project’s rubric. Selover’s favorite question asks students to explain why it’s important to advocate for change they want to see in their communities, even if the goals are not achieved.

“I’m always really blown away by their answers on this question,” he said. “They recognize that advocacy itself is valuable. It was good practice for them to understand someone else’s perspective and propose a change that would help make their lives easier.”

For Selover, the lesson’s impact is undeniable.

“This project wouldn’t exist without that iCivics lesson. It has created so many positive things in our school. Y’all gave me the inspiration, and we just made it a little bit bigger.”

About Luke

Teaching experience: 10+ years—5th and 6th grade humanities

School/Organization: Capitol Hill Day School

From Monuments to Movements: Inspiring the Next Generation of Civic Leaders

Huddled beneath umbrellas on a drizzly day in our nation’s capital, the newest cohort of iCivics Youth Fellows sat in small groups at the edge of the Tidal Basin. Deep in conversation, they reflected on the words and legacies of some of America’s most influential voices, encountered through the surrounding monuments and memorials. Though nearly complete strangers, the students engaged with one another’s perspectives as they looked ahead to the year they’ll spend together.

Held September 25–29, the Washington, D.C. Symposium serves as the in-person kickoff to the fellowship year. Fellows connected and built community while learning alongside alumni mentors and iCivics staff. They explored the home of the federal government with visits to the U.S. Capitol, the Supreme Court, and the White House, and spent time among the monuments and museums of the National Mall, including the Library of Congress, the National Museum of African American History and Culture, the National Gallery of Art, and the National Museum of Natural History.

Here’s some of what the Fellows had to say about the trip:

  • “The iCivics Youth Fellowship has given me the opportunity to understand perspectives that I hadn’t otherwise interacted with. The amount of passion each fellow had for their platforms is a picturesque example of civic engagement and advocacy. Seeing other people my age lobbying for change gives me great anticipation for the future.” – Ava June T. (KY)
  • “The trip to Washington, D.C. made me think about not only the foundations of American democracy, but my role within it; it made me question what it truly means to be civically engaged, and why civic engagement is so important. Seeing monuments like the MLK Jr. and Korean War memorials made me think about our moral obligation to stand for what’s right, not just as Americans, but as humans. Conversing with my peers expanded my mindset and helped me better understand varying perspectives, even when I didn’t always agree. Overall, the trip represented the very purpose of this program, which is to inspire students across the country to uphold America’s democracy.” – Camryn H. (OH)
  • “I am very thankful for the D.C. trip. It helped me to see the real workings of our government in person, which I find really awesome. Thanks to iCivics, I was able to foster discussion with youth fellows who share a passion for civic engagement, and diversify both my own perspective and those of my peers.” – Bradley M. (Alumni Mentor, CA)

The iCivics Youth Fellowship is a paid, yearlong program for U.S. high school students to build a movement led by and for young civic leaders. Designed to elevate and center youth voices, the fellowship fosters a pluralistic, talented community of students from across the country. Over ten months, Fellows engage in an immersive civic learning experience, investigating, discussing, and sometimes debating questions like: How can I identify civic issues I care about and connect them to others’ experiences? How do we use civil discourse to find common ground in disagreement? And how can I share my voice as an advocate for civic learning and engagement?

The connections and friendships established in D.C. are invaluable as Fellows embark on building their Civic Engagement Portfolios throughout the year, selecting from a range of experiences in their communities related to local policy, news, decision-making bodies, and service. They also conduct and share Community Research Projects that highlight their lived experiences with civic education and engagement. Later in the year, Fellows collaborate on Student Panel Discussions focused on regional or national civic education topics that connect across their local communities.

Upon completion of the program, Youth Fellows join our ever-growing Alumni Network. This network provides myriad opportunities, including applying to serve as an alumni mentor to a new cohort of Youth Fellows, representing youth voice and the civic movement at various iCivics events, and collaborating on the creation of iCivics resources. They have even been featured in media such as The Wall Street Journal, Chicago Tribune, and WBUR in Boston.

Spending a long weekend with this group of students filled my cup as I got to know each of their unique stories and interests, engaged in critical thinking and dialogue together, and shared laughs over meals. As iCivics works to inspire young people for informed civic engagement, these young leaders will no doubt help shape the future of civic learning and engagement in our country.

Whether you’re a Youth Fellows alumnus who’d like to share how the D.C. Symposium impacted you, a high school student interested in applying for next year’s cohort, or an educator eager to learn more, I’d love to hear from you!

Contact: [email protected]

Written by Troy Petrie

As the Associate Director for Youth Engagement at iCivics, Troy leads efforts to empower young people to find their civic voice and engage in their communities. Before joining iCivics, his happy place was in the classroom as a National Board Certified social studies teacher. Troy’s work is driven by a deep belief that we all have more in common than we do apart and that young people are the real changemakers in our society.

iCivics Youth Fellowship Marks its Seventh Year

The iCivics Youth Fellowship helps students from across the country build civic leadership skills and explore how they can help make civic education relevant and accessible to all young people.

CAMBRIDGE, Mass. [October 17, 2025] – Earlier this year, iCivics selected 34 talented high school students from across the country to take part in the iCivics Youth Fellowship. The students were selected after a competitive process that garnered over 500 applicants from 46 states and Washington, D.C.

The yearlong fellowship helps students develop leadership and communications skills as they collaborate with their peers and learn from experts in the field of civic education. Throughout the year, students research and explore youth engagement in civic spaces and the state of civic education across the United States. Fellows utilize their own lived experiences to become ambassadors for civic education and shed light on how civics can include student voices from every background.

The fellowship kicked off in August and moved into full gear with an in-person symposium in Washington, D.C., at the end of September.

“The Washington D.C. Symposium is a foundational experience for the Youth Fellows,” said iCivics Associate Director of Youth Engagement, Troy Petrie. “For some, it’s the first time traveling on their own. For most, it’s the first time they get to engage with viewpoints and perspectives different from their own. For all of the fellows, it’s a realization that we have more in common than we do apart. That’s exactly what the Youth Fellowship is all about.”

The fellowship will run through the 2025–26 school year, during which fellows will engage in virtual group discussions, workshops, and lectures with experts in the field, and undertake projects designed to strengthen their listening and collaborative skills. The fellows’ work centers around ensuring that civic education is available and relevant to all students in the United States.

Over the past seven years, students from across the country, representing rural, urban, and suburban school districts, have participated in the fellowship and become an integral part of informing the broader civic education movement. Fellows and alumni have shared their experiences and thoughts at convenings for the Educating for American Democracy initiative, Ronald Reagan Institute, Civic Learning Week, Commonwealth Club, and Andrew Goodman Foundation. They have been featured in media such as The Wall Street Journal, Chicago Tribune, and WBUR in Boston.

iCivics is proud to announce this year’s participants:

Arizona

Arkansas

California

Kosomak L.

Athena C.

Maxine P.

Colorado

Florida

Georgia

Lorenzo W.

Justin C.

Frank U.

Dante E.

Naomi L.

Illinois

Iowa

Kentucky

Jackson T.

Jocelyn M.

Katherine H.

Ava June T.

Maine

Maryland

Michigan

William C.

Makayli G.

Raizel H.

Rebecca M.

Logan S.

Minnesota

Missouri

New Jersey

Fatima A.

Abdullahi H.

Ridhima K.

Kayla H.

New York

Ohio

Pennsylvania 

Eva F.

Summer H.

Camryn H.

Charlie L.

Landon F.

Miguel R. M.

Tennessee

Texas

Utah

Majdi A.

Marco M.

Wyatt H.

Lahpo K.

Virginia

Wisconsin

Alumni Mentors

Jacqueline A.

Ayden B.

Ethan W.

Liana A. ‘23 (ME)

Addison A. ‘23 (LA)

Imre H. ‘24 (OH)

Anvitha M. ‘21 (CA)

Bradley M. ‘24 (CA)

Carina M. ‘24 (WA)

Fola O. ‘23 (MI)

Tanner O. ‘24 (NM)

We Can Teach Hard Things, like Separation of Powers

You’re a social studies teacher, and it’s time to teach the separation of powers. Easy peasy! The Separation of Powers is as fundamental a civics topic as can be found. No controversy here!! *record scratches*

Don’t worry! I’ve got you covered.

The first thing you want to do is consult your state standards. Let’s use an example. Since my favorite crises of the Separation of Powers revolved around Senator Joseph McCarthy from Wisconsin, let’s go with the Badger State!

According to Wisconsin’s Standards for Social Studies, students in grades 6-8 should “Analyze the structure, functions, powers, and limitations of government at the local, state, tribal, and federal levels.” Students in grades 9-12 should “Evaluate the structure and functions of governments at the local, state, tribal, national, and global levels. Evaluate the purpose of political institutions at the local, state, tribal, national, global, and supranational or NGO levels, distinguishing their roles, powers, and limitations.”

There you go — if you teach in Wisconsin (and most other states), it’s absolutely part of your job to teach this topic. Remember that.

Moving beyond standards, one of the best parts about teaching government is that many of its concepts are structural or procedural and abstract. One of the worst parts is that many of its concepts are structural or procedural and abstract.

Put another way, on one hand, we merely need to explain and describe. It’s pretty straightforward. On the other hand, these concepts are dry, emotionless, abstract, and otherwise difficult for students to fully grasp.

Here’s the good news, which is also the bad news: in practice, most government concepts are not straightforward. They are complex and controversial.

What’s a dedicated, well-meaning teacher to do?

Let’s start by looking at the bright side (this stuff is structural and procedural!!) and leverage one of our go-to tips: “Leaning into structure and process for civics and government.”

With the separation of powers, it’s actually best to start with structure and then move to process. Structure is even easier to explain, especially since we can use actual structures as symbols of the institutions we’re describing. Take this graphic:

This graphic is so old, I think my own government teacher used it in 1999 when I was in her class. But it’s great! It’s perfect! It’s listed under a Creative Commons license. Phew!

Here are some additional iCivics Resources to help you through it, should you (appropriately) believe this graphic to be inadequate:

Now, you may feel tempted to avoid the hard things and end your lesson here. But remember, the standard says, “Analyze the structure, functions, powers, and limitations of government.” I suppose you likely scratched the surface here with functions when you talked about the Legislative Branch making the law, the Executive Branch enforcing the law, and the Judicial Branch interpreting the law, but a) that doesn’t cover powers and limitations, and b) none of that means anything to your students without context and examples.

This brings us to another go-to tip: Use historical examples instead of current ones. Various events in American history have tested the limits of the Constitution’s separation of powers. These events demonstrate the ongoing tension and potential for conflict between the different branches of government.

Here are some of my favorite examples of the separation of powers playing out in American history:

  • The New Deal
  • FDR’s Court Packing Plan
  • Steel Mill Seizure
  • The McCarthy Era
  • The Civil Rights Movement
  • Watergate
  • The Iran-Contra affair

Additionally, these events allow us to examine the separation of powers and controversies surrounding it without the partisan preferences and emotions that often accompany more recent or current controversies. I mean, I know my history, but I don’t get all worked up over President Truman seizing control of the steel mills to prevent a devastating strike that would disrupt military production during the Korean War, even if it does seem like a reach of executive power. Let’s assume our students won’t either.

Once we’ve covered the structure, functions, powers, and limitations, and provided some historical examples, it’s time for the students to think about what it all means. That brings us to…

Important Questions to Ask

  • What do we mean when we refer to the separation of powers as a system of checks and balances?
  • Can you think of an example when it might be necessary for one branch to exercise more power than the other branches?
  • What would happen if too much power were concentrated in one branch of government without checks by the other branches?

Now, I know what you’re thinking: “What should I do if Susie in the front row responds to that last question by asking, ‘Do you mean like how the President is acting right now?’”

This very thing happened to me when I was teaching in the 2000s. Here’s my advice:

  • Take a breath.
  • Acknowledge the question, but don’t validate, correct, or otherwise answer it.
  • If you’re so inclined, praise the student for paying attention to current events (and to your lesson!).
  • Don’t assume anyone else in the classroom knows what Susie in the front row is talking about. This point is extra important! There is no need to spend valuable class time having an unplanned 1:1 conversation with just one student when no one else in the room has the foggiest idea what y’all are talking about.

Here’s a sample response: That’s a great question, Susie. I can tell you’ve been paying attention, both to the news and to what we’ve been exploring in class. The current administration has been in the news a lot, and its actions are related to what we’ve been covering. We’re not going to talk about current events right now, but here’s something for you to think about as you continue following the news: “What exactly is happening right now, and is this how it’s always been done? How is it similar or different?”

Alternatively, you could ask these questions preemptively and suggest that students follow the news, consider the questions, and discuss them with fellow students and/or family members. I realize that last suggestion may seem a little risky, but remember: you haven’t made any political or value judgments. If anyone challenges you, you can confidently and politely respond that you are encouraging students to engage in compare and contrast thinking between historical and current events, and that you’re so glad to know they’re doing their homework!

Remember: you’re doing your job, and your job matters a whole lot.

Admin Tip: Reach out to your social studies teachers and ask if they need any additional help with content this year. Maybe a subject matter expert can help them understand how the separation of powers has evolved over time. As always, tell your social studies teachers you are there to support them!

A New Generation of “iCivics Kids”

This guest blog post was written by Rachel Gärlick and Lynnie Lucas, close friends and young attorneys who, inspired by their own civic education, are now advocating for more and better civic education for school-age Americans. 

We met on the first day of law school and quickly bonded over a shared goal: harnessing the legal system to expand access to education. In our second year, we channeled that passion into researching civic engagement among American youth and the state of civic education in the United States through the lens of education law and policy. Our work culminated in the publication of our article, Civics Education: The Unsung Guardian of Democracy, by the Charleston Law Review earlier this year. In it, we argue that a strong, enduring constitutional democracy requires engaged citizens of all ages, and the key to that engagement among young Americans is robust civic education.

Simply put, it is impossible to understand the implications of modern legislation or jurisprudence, or the importance of civic engagement (especially voting), without a baseline understanding of how the democratic system works. And yet, students across the United States do not receive adequate civic education in school. Our research shows that while STEM subjects have been prioritized in recent years, civics has been sidelined. This is not only evidenced by education standards but also by the vast disparity in funding across the two disciplines. Accordingly, students are left without the tools they need to understand government, legislation, or their role as voters—the very knowledge required of them to maintain our democratic republic.

There is ample evidence that young voters are not receiving the tools they need to meaningfully participate in our democratic system. A 2024 survey by America’s Promise Alliance found that nearly “one quarter of young people (24%) did not learn about or discuss civics at all during the past school year. . . . About one in 10 young people (13%) have not had any coursework focused on civics, politics, and democracy at any point while in school or college.” It is no surprise, then, that young Americans reported they are “regularly asked to weigh in on politics, but they feel uninformed—and these feelings of being uninformed often lead to sitting out.” Notably, 91% of young Americans surveyed agreed that “[e]veryone should have access to opportunities to learn about democracy and civics,” and 83% agreed that “[c]lasses on civics and government should be a requirement for high school graduation.”

In other words, young people are asking for civic education; the adults are failing to provide it.

We propose a number of solutions in our article, but we also highlight the important work that is already being done—that’s where iCivics comes in. Those fortunate enough to have access to iCivics early on (we lovingly refer to them as “iCivics Kids”) are building foundational knowledge that will allow them to be strong civic leaders. An “iCivics Kid” is passionate about respectful political debate, intentional in researching and understanding news sources before sharing content online, and excited to keep learning about our democracy and how we can improve it in the future. We could share additional healthy democratic dispositions that iCivics cultivates, but you get the point: iCivics is what our young people deserve and what our form of government demands.

Our personal journeys illustrate both sides of the civics gap. 

Lynnie became an “iCivics Kid” in elementary school—she won the White House, got in “argument wars,” and briefed the chief. Lynnie credits her early experience with iCivics with providing the foundational skills she needed to be an informed and engaged citizen. In contrast, Rachel’s civic education was inadequate at best, and nearly non-existent at worst. When she started studying for the AP Government exam, she realized just how large the gap in her civic education was—she might have been able to explain checks and balances, but she couldn’t articulate why they were important.

Lynnie’s passion for democracy and civic education is rooted in her belief that all students should graduate with the same strong foundational understanding she did, while Rachel’s is rooted in her belief that no student should graduate confused about what Congress actually does and unsure whether her vote matters as she did.

While our paths to becoming civic education advocates differ, we share the core belief that it is vital, undervalued, and essential to safeguarding democracy. We believe in the importance of cultivating a new generation of “iCivics Kids.” We are incredibly grateful and honored to partner with iCivics and CivxNow and support their efforts to improve access to high-quality civic education.

After becoming licensed attorneys, we both sought legal careers that allow us to advocate for children and families. Lynnie is an attorney in Denver, Colorado, practicing education and youth rights law. She stands up for kids on the school-to-prison pipeline, steering them away from the criminal legal system by helping them obtain the educational resources they need. Rachel is a family law attorney in Denver, Colorado, focused on championing parents and their children as they navigate the domestic relations legal system.

But we both understand that the role of citizen belongs to all of us, regardless of our profession. Whether future “iCivics Kids” pursue law, medicine, business, tech, the trades, or any of the other meaningful career options before them, every one of them will have the job—the duty—to actively engage in our constitutional democracy.

Written by Rachel Gärlick and Lynnie Lucas

Rachel Gärlick is a family law attorney focused on advocating for parents and their children as they navigate the domestic relations legal system. Rachel co-authored the article Civics Education: The Unsung Guardian of Democracy, which was published in the Charleston Law Review earlier this year, with her dear friend and colleague Lynnie Lucas. Rachel believes that education is not only a cornerstone of democracy but also a pathway to justice and empowerment and is dedicated to advancing access to education for all students. Rachel lives and practices law in Denver, Colorado.

Lynnie Lucas is an education and youth rights attorney providing legal services targeted to slow the school-to-prison pipeline. Through discipline, special education, truancy, and other school-based defense, she works to keep kids in classrooms and out of the criminal legal system. Lynnie is passionate about civic engagement and learning. She co-authored an article about access to civics education, which was published in the Charleston Law Review this spring. She is in active pursuit of education equity every day, and she hopes to encourage school districts and school boards to break barriers and come up with creative solutions for students of all backgrounds. Lynnie lives and practices law in Denver, Colorado.