Education Week recently ran an article entitled, “Why Most Teachers Won’t Be Talking About the Election in Their Classrooms.”
First, I want to clarify an important point, and then take up the larger underlying issue. While the article rightly notes that “most teachers don’t plan to address the 2024 presidential election” in referring to a broad survey of teachers across subjects, it is absolutely the job of our social studies teachers to leverage this teachable moment, and I know for a fact that many intend to do so.
To address the larger underlying issue, I share what the late U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor frequently said, which led to her founding iCivics: “The practice of democracy is not passed down through the gene pool. It must be taught and learned by each new generation.”
As we near the 250th anniversary of this audacious experiment in self-government that we call the United States, it is essential for the next 250 years and beyond that each new generation be prepared to pick up the mantle.
That means we can’t shy away from tough topics. As one student noted, “We don’t stop algebra when it gets hard. We work through it.” I would argue we need that mindset at least as much for democracy as any other subject.
I’ve been in this civic education business for more than 20 years. I know there are three co-equal branches in our government. I know how the Electoral College works. I know that we hold national elections on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November because when else would we do it?
I know all of these things because I WAS TAUGHT ALL OF THESE THINGS. Sorry for shouting. This is my passion.
And I wasn’t just taught these things through textbook pages and worksheets unattached to the sometimes exciting, sometimes horrifying current events happening all around me. On the contrary, I was taught these things through current—and, yes, oftentimes controversial—events happening all around me.
No matter how messy things were, no matter how scared or uncertain I felt, I always knew that I could walk into my social studies class where a passionate, college-educated subject-matter expert would help me navigate the madness. Mr. Madden, Mrs. Stecker, Mr. Wilkner, Mrs. Moyer, Mrs. Tozzi, Mr. Beasley didn’t always have all of the answers. But they knew what I now know: that young people need structured, intellectual spaces to make sense of it all—to talk about current events, to discuss contentious issues, and to have their viewpoints both validated and challenged in a nurturing educational environment.
This year’s presidential election is unprecedented in a number of ways, and we do our kids a disservice if we don’t help them navigate these waters and, while we’re at it, help them see why they should care enough to dive in.
This brings me to another important point. Every year, we hear the same thing: young people are apathetic.
That’s just not true.
It’s not that kids don’t care. It’s that WE—the “adults”—seem to have decided that we care so much that we’ve made politics taboo, controversial, and too incendiary for polite or even scholarly conversation.
In fear of appearing political, we’ve embraced, modeled, and encouraged disinterest. In doing so, we risk undermining the very mission of public schools to prepare young people for their roles as citizens in our democratic republic.
For the love of George Washington’s wooden, wine-stained teeth, can we please take a breath and teach the next generation a thing or two about the government they are to inherit?
