Chris shows students the power of their voices with Race to Ratify

I’ve been teaching for more than 20 years, but this year is my first teaching 7th grade civics. So over the summer, I went on a hunt for resources that would engage those students. I love using immersive activities like mock trials, escape rooms, and simulations to help them connect theory with experience. When I discovered the game Race to Ratify, I knew I’d found something good. We played it recently, as part of the Civic Star Challenge.

The game takes place in 1787-1789, right after the Constitution is written, during the debate over whether the states should ratify it. Players travel across the 13 states, interviewing different people to gather arguments to create pamphlets that support either the Federalists or Anti-Federalists. They might encounter a farmer who’s worried about taxation and federal power, or an enslaved person who raises questions about whose rights the Constitution protects. As they gather these myriad perspectives, the game really drives home how difficult it was to rally support. 

After each conversation, the player gets an “argument token” they can use for their pamphlet. Then they must carefully evaluate which arguments will allow them to build their case and lead to a favorable vote. On more than one occasion, a student admitted “Mr. Knox, I’m starting to run out of evidence to support my side!” That led to some good conversations around strategy: Have you talked to the right people? How might you best use the evidence you have left to make your argument?

I was surprised to see several students enthusiastically lobbying against the Constitution—but maybe I shouldn’t have been! Seventh grade is often when students begin testing ideas more independently. They are asking: What do I think? What do I believe? What would I change if I could? These questions lead naturally to: How can things be different? As they tried out a counter-factual narrative of history, I knew they were starting to see how their own actions will impact the next chapter of our nation’s story. 

I find that so exciting. So much of what we focus on in the study of history is the timeline of events: here’s what happened, here’s what happened, here’s what happened. Race to Ratify reminds us that each of those things happened because a person or a group made a choice. Each decision we make has a domino effect, which is why it’s so important for us to carefully consider the impact of our choices.

Civics lessons are often about laws passed on the state and federal levels, and elections my students won’t vote in for years. Here in middle school, we don’t have laws, per se, but we do have policies that students can shape right now. In my class, we’re learning how to build a strategy. Students chart the steps: here’s the change I’d like to make; here’s the information I need to learn and evidence I need to gather; here are the change agents I need to engage; and here’s how I would convince them to join my initiative. These become the building blocks for 12 and 13-year-olds to truly engage in civics.

About Chris

  • Teaching experience: 20+ years
  • Currently teaching: 7th grade civics 

Chris is a 7th grade civics teacher with more than 20 years of teaching experience. A Flagler County Social Studies Teacher of the Year and curriculum designer, he creates high-interest lessons that help students think critically and connect classroom learning to their daily lives. He has also designed assessments for district and state use.

New Research: Americans Want Civic Education. Let’s Give It to Them.

The American Enterprise Institute (AEI) just released its 2026 Civic Values Survey, which shows continuing sky-high levels of public support for civic education:

  • 83% say all students should be required to study American history; and,
  • 75% say high schoolers should study the Declaration of Independence this anniversary year; 

This is good news, but it comes alongside some cautionary data as well. More than four in ten adults said they would need to look up the rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights to remember them, and 61% believe children today get a worse education than they did. And interestingly, a majority (52%) said families, not schools, should take primary responsibility for teaching what America stands for. 

The findings point to the polarization and low trust in institutions that continue to bedevil our nation, but the difference today is that momentum for strengthening civic learning is real.

Following long-term advocacy from many in our community, the National Assessment Governing Board (NAGB) moved the voluntary state-level National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Civics assessment for 8th graders up to 2028 and, for the first time, results will be disaggregated by state. Simultaneously, NAGB will develop a new framework aligned with the needs of our digital democracy for the NAEP Civics assessment, with scheduled deployment in 2032. 

Civic seals, credentials affixed to a high school diploma certifying demonstrated civic knowledge and skill, have now been adopted in 19 states spanning the political spectrum, reaching nearly half of America’s schoolchildren. In recent months, civic seals legislation passed in Alaska, Connecticut, Idaho, Iowa, Maryland, and New Hampshire.

This momentum comes at a time when emerging technology is forcing us to rethink the very foundations of educating America’s young people. On the doorstep of America’s 250th anniversary, we have an opportunity to return civics to a central place in our education system, just as the founding generation intended, by advocating for participation in NAEP Civics and adoption of civic seals across all 50 states.

One point in the survey that we did find heartening was that 62 percent of those surveyed said that democracy needs to be taught because it is not implicitly learned. This is one of the principles upon which iCivics was created, as our  founder, the late Associate U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, used as her rallying cry for civic education: “The practice of democracy is not passed down through the gene pool. It must be taught and learned anew by each generation of citizens.”

Nicole teaches American history and experiences through a field trip

In my classes, I strive to create an interconnected narrative, each topic building upon the next. 

We start by analyzing the Declaration of Independence and the Preamble. The language and ideas in these documents become the golden thread that pulls us through the school year – and through America’s story.

I ask my students to be part of that story.

The Civic Star Challenge inspired me to develop a lesson in which students apply the concepts in the Declaration to the push/pull factors around immigration – specifically, the experience of immigrants on Angel Island. Unlike Ellis Island, Angel Island was often used to restrict immigration, especially from Asia, and to enforce laws such as the Chinese Exclusion Act. Many people who arrived there faced long detentions, harsh questioning, discrimination, and dehumanizing treatment. I wanted students to consider: if they were pulled to this country for a better life, what would they feel if their first encounter with America was such blatant mistreatment? 

We stepped into that experience through a virtual field trip to the Angel Island Immigration Station (which we accessed through the California State Parks’ PORTS program). Our ranger guide brilliantly led us through the museum, really listening to the students along the way. We saw the rooms where immigrants slept and spotted Chinese poetry carved into the walls – a small act of resistance. 

Every single class period, students asked “why would the immigrants still choose to come?” They were learning that the promise of American ideals were strong enough for immigrants to take incredible risks. At the same time, they were able to reflect upon the historical forces that would degrade these ideals and imagine how it would feel to be caught up in their negation. After the visit, some students wrote about the shock immigrants must have felt when, at the end of the long journey in search of a better life, they were met with invasive interrogations, onerous paperwork, and very little privacy. One student drew the image of money locked behind a barbed-wire gate, to show how immigrants discovered that the dream of “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” wasn’t free.

This is a complicated concept for students in middle school, but I was thrilled to watch them considering it with nuance and depth. They recognized that while the discrimination immigrants faced challenged the idealism they might have had when they arrived, it may have also made them even more determined to succeed here. Many of my students have immigration stories in their own families, so this lesson felt especially personal. But even for students without that direct connection, Angel Island helped them see a larger civic truth: American ideals matter most when we ask who has been allowed to claim them, and who has had to fight for them.

About Nicole

  • Teaching experience: 24 years 
  • Currently teaching: 8th grade social studies

Nicole is a National Board Certified teacher whose work focuses on inspiring students to love history and civics. She also helps lead civic and sustainability initiatives across her campus.

Civics isn’t a given, and other exciting takeaways from our research

Americans have always looked to schools to prepare young people for their roles as citizens in our constitutional democracy, and today, 92% of Americans agree that civic education is critical to the country’s success. In other words, even though we struggle to agree on basic facts, we strongly agree that civic education matters—and that K–12 schools are where it should be taught. 

But with only five states requiring a middle school civics course and 14 states requiring no civics courses at all, where is this civic education supposed to happen? I asked the guy sitting next to me on the plane on my way home from a civic education symposium in Philadelphia. His cautious response, to my delight and his relief: “In social studies classrooms?”

Correct. Since 1918, K–12 instruction in history, civics, government, geography, economics, and other liberal arts has been encapsulated under the umbrella of “social studies.” 

In the ring of social studies instruction in the United States, history is the undisputed heavyweight. Students receive far more instruction in history than in civics, government, economics, or geography—likely to the tune of 50% or more of their total instructional time.

At the same time, society expects schools to foster “civic dispositions,” the habits and hearts of active citizens. Most people assume this happens naturally within those social studies blocks. However, the data tell a different story.

History classes do not, in and of themselves, instill civic dispositions.

As we approach the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, a new evaluation by the American Institutes for Research (AIR) of the iCivics Through Inquiry curriculum offers a reality check. It proves that if we want engaged citizens, we have to stop relying on history to do the work of civics by accident.

Conducted during the 2024–2025 school year across three diverse urban districts, the evaluation found that when history is taught with an intentional civic lens, students changed their behavior. Compared to their peers, students in the iCivics program were:

  • Significantly more likely to report interest in politics and current events.
  • Significantly more likely to report checking the news multiple times a day.
  • Substantially more likely to talk about politics and current events with friends, family, teachers, or other adults at school.
  • Noticeably more likely to report valuing their education in U.S. History. 

The biggest takeaway? Civic engagement isn’t a byproduct of history instruction; it’s a design choice.

The Through Inquiry curriculum intentionally weaves primary source analysis and civic identity into the historical arc. We can’t expect kids to become responsible citizens simply by sitting in a history classroom for 180 days; we have to integrate a civic ethos that is supported by the instructional activities we know to cultivate civic outcomes. 

A curriculum is only as good as the person standing at the front of the room. The study found that 93% of teachers intend to continue using iCivics materials. Moreover, coaching and professional learning were the most critical factors for success.

This couldn’t come at a more important time, because a systemic shift for civics is on the horizon. The National Assessment Governing Board has announced that it will move the voluntary state-level NAEP civics assessment for eighth graders up to 2028, assess twelfth graders for the first time since 2010, and, crucially, report results disaggregated by state. If all 50 states adopt the standards, as we are hopeful they will, a wave of change is about to occur, leading to students having stronger civic knowledge, skills, and attitudes when they graduate from high school. 

These are developments that matter more for America’s 250th and our future than any of the pomp, circumstance, or fireworks that we will nonetheless enjoy on the Fourth of July.

Kimberly bridges history and community to teach the importance of civic engagement

Teaching civics at a career technical school is sometimes an exercise in translation. Wayne County Schools Career Center hosts 26 programs for high school juniors and seniors; from animal science to culinary arts to sports medicine, it really runs the gamut. My students are sometimes skeptical that knowing about government will help them excel in their trades. I like to say, “You may not need the Pythagorean theorem every day, but you do need to know your constitutional rights! You need to know what the law is!” And it’s my mission to show them why.

I do that by bringing the trades into my lessons. With criminal justice students, we connect the Bill of Rights to the work they hope to do. With nursing students, we talk about Medicare, Medicaid, and the policies that shape patient care. With students in service fields, we talk about the rules, rights, and responsibilities that affect the people they will serve. And we talk about how WCSCC, itself, resembles our country in its earliest years: here, students from a dozen other schools come together in pursuit of a common goal.

One way I build that bridge is by helping students see civics in the places they already know.

Sometimes it’s helpful to see the connections on paper—specifically, on maps of our region. As part of the Civic Star Challenge, I built a series of classes based on the Northwest Ordinance and Ohio’s path to statehood. Students aren’t used to using physical maps these days – they look on their phones for directions. So it was a bit of a novelty when we broke out maps of Wayne County and I asked them to start plotting coordinates. They were struck by the tidy grid of our 16 townships, each 6 by 6 miles. That framework is lasting evidence of the Land Ordinance of 1785. 

I pointed out that Section 16 of each of these townships was reserved for public education. Why? Because the founders understood that if people are going to live in a republic of self-government, it would be vitally important that they have access to education. And so, we can connect the Northwest Ordinance to the free public education enshrined in the Ohio Constitution.

I also explained that the way each township is zoned determines whether you live next to a farm, a store, a factory, or a new housing development. And of course, each township has a trustee. When my students turn 18, they will not just vote for president. They will vote for local leaders who make decisions that shape the roads, land, services, and neighborhoods around them.

I see it as a calling to produce educated citizens. Although I couldn’t serve in the military like my siblings, teaching is a way I can fulfill my patriotic duty and keep our nation thriving for generations. If I can make the US Constitution feel tangible and alive to my students, they’ll be more likely to defend and preserve it. From time to time, I’ll get a letter or a message from a former student who is serving overseas and I’m reminded that civic education is not abstract. They understand that the Constitution is not just something we study. It is something people serve, protect, and carry with them. That makes me incredibly proud. That is what I want for all of my students, whether they become nurses, mechanics, chefs, public servants, business owners, or members of the military. I want them to see that civics is not separate from their lives. It is part of the communities they will work in, vote in, serve in, and help shape.

About Kimberly

  • Teaching experience: 31+ years in Social Studies Education
  • Currently teaching: American Government and CCP Political Science, Adjunct Professor

Kimberly Huffman is dedicated to helping young people enhance their constitutional knowledge and empower their political efficacy. Her teaching and leadership are shaped by deep commitments to promoting and encouraging democratic engagement. Through her service on NCSS and national educator networks, she hopes to elevate the importance of civic education across the country.